RiskyEats

License records

Official records + calculations Counts and statistics derived from cited public records. Definitions →

Inspector District Trends

Inspection activity, citation spikes, and potential coverage gaps by district.

Inspector-district activity separates restaurant risk from coverage intensity. IRL needs this credibility check: high citation counts can mean risky operators, stricter inspectors, heavier coverage, or all three.

Updated 2026-09-01 14:33 UTC

Charts

Most-active districts

Most-active districts. 7 plotted observations, ranging from 76660.00 to 229985.00. Open the data table for exact values.

Interactive chart loading; the data table below is the accessible fallback.

View data table

District trends

D4 229985 239378 1.04 3370
D3 190879 171539 0.90 6366
D2 180827 211603 1.17 4170
D1 156179 142853 0.91 1978
D5 130984 163540 1.25 4003
D7 120372 105676 0.88 1746
D6 76660 42825 0.56 1532

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Data sources: License records. Built from DBPR public inspection records, Florida Sunbiz business filings, and Foursquare/OSS location data. All counts are derived from public records — no estimates or projections unless labeled as forecast.

Share: Facebook X LinkedIn Email