RiskyEats

License records

Official records + calculations Counts and statistics derived from cited public records. Definitions →

Inspector District Trends

Inspection activity, citation spikes, and potential coverage gaps by district.

Inspector-district activity separates restaurant risk from coverage intensity. IRL needs this credibility check: high citation counts can mean risky operators, stricter inspectors, heavier coverage, or all three.

Updated 2026-10-15 14:35 UTC

Charts

Most-active districts

Most-active districts. 7 plotted observations, ranging from 77656.00 to 234421.00. Open the data table for exact values.

Interactive chart loading; the data table below is the accessible fallback.

View data table

District trends

D4 234421 243472 1.04 3452
D3 194265 173994 0.90 6477
D2 183846 215849 1.17 4239
D1 159582 146335 0.92 2025
D5 133369 166492 1.25 4121
D7 122591 107447 0.88 1774
D6 77656 43284 0.56 1548

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Data sources: License records. Built from DBPR public inspection records, Florida Sunbiz business filings, and Foursquare/OSS location data. All counts are derived from public records โ€” no estimates or projections unless labeled as forecast.

Share: Facebook X LinkedIn Email